Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Sociology. Politology

ISSN 1818-9601 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8998 (Online)


For citation:

Mogilevich B. R. From the linguistic turn in sociology to narrative . Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 276-281. DOI: 10.18500/1818-9601-2025-25-3-276-281, EDN: IZDVTW

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
37.03+81.271.2
EDN: 
IZDVTW

From the linguistic turn in sociology to narrative

Autors: 
Mogilevich Branislava R., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The linguistic turn in sociology has established language-related issues as a primary focus in the examination of socio-humanitarian human activities. The acceptance of texts (linguistic statements) as socio-cultural phenomena that construct social reality facilitates the exploration of socio-cultural contexts and value-behavioral models of social actors engaged in social actions. However, the assertions regarding the social role of language that delineate the specifi city of social actions have not consistently been acknowledged. Symbolic interactionism, ethnomethodology, phenomenology, the theory of communicative actions, hermeneutics, and the theory of speech acts have provided the methodological foundation for regarding language as a defi ning element, thereby contributing to the development of the linguistic turn in socio-humanitarian research. A particular signifi cance in the establishment of linguistics (language and speech) as a crucial component of human activity is attributed to P. Bourdieu, who identifi ed language as the principal marker of individual sociality. Conversely, the linguistic turn has served as a foundational  point for the emergence of the narrative turn, regarded as an eff ective instrument in sociological inquiry. The narrative/description/narrative framework possesses its own rationale for defi ning the individual as a central subject of sociological investigation. The diversity of interpretations of identical events is infl uenced, on one hand, by the subjective particularities of respondents and, on the other hand, by the spatio-temporal context. The ethnomethodological uniqueness of the narrative encapsulates the quotidian experiences of individuals in the dynamics of their interactions, refl ections, everyday behavioral models, and the organization of their life cycles. The phenomenological character of the narrative is epitomized by the phenomenon of sociological rewriting, which amalgamates an objective worldview with its subjective interpretations and the emotional nuances of the description. The postmodern perspective on the narrative underscores, primarily, the limitless array of subjective interpretations and the technique of deconstructing texts to unearth concealed meanings. Employing narrative as a sociological tool enables a thorough description and analysis of not only the social actions of individuals in their everyday lives but also the examination of social reality.

Reference: 
  1. Конт О. Общий обзор позитивизма / пер. с фр. И. А. Шапиро ; под ред. Э. Л. Радлова. Изд. 3-е, репр. М. : ЛИБРОКОМ, 2012. 200 с. (Из наследия мировой философской мысли: история философии).
  2. Вебер М. Основные социологические понятия. М. : Директ-Медиа, 2014. 52 с.
  3. Мид Дж. Г. Избранное / сост. и пер. В. Г Николаев ; отв. ред. Д. В. Ефременко. М. : ИНИОН РАН, 2009. 290 с. (Теория и история социологии). EDN: MQGIQ 
  4. Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В. В. Бибихина. Харьков : Фолио, 2003 (Тип. изд-ва Самар. Дом печати). 510 с. (Philosophy).
  5. Гадамер Х. Г. Истина и метод: Основы философской герменевтики : пер. с нем. / общ. ред. Б. Н. Бессонова. М. : Прогресс, 1988. 700 с.
  6. Ricoeur P. Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Essays on language, action and interpretations / ed. and transl. by J. B. Thompson. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press ; Paris : Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’homme, 1981. 314 р.
  7. Franzosi R. Narrative analysis – or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative // Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.517
  8. Searle J. R. The construction of social reality. New York : Liberty Press, 1995. 518 p.
  9. Habermas J. Communication and the evolution of society / transl. a. with an introd. by T. McCarthy. Boston : Beacon press, Cop._1979. 239 p. (Beacon paperback. Philosophy, sociology, polit. science).
  10. Бурдье П. Начала : сб. : пер. с фр. М. : Socio-Logos, 1994. 287 с.
  11. Лю Ц. О лингвистическом повороте в социологии // Социологические исследования. 2018. № 7. С. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250000185-6 
  12. Могилевич Б. Р. Полилингвизм как лингвистический капитал информационного общества // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2020. Т. 26, № 1. С. 188–208. https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-188-208
  13. Labov W. Some further steps in narrative analysis // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1997. Vol. 7, iss. 1–4. P. 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
  14. Добрякова М. С. Исследования локальных сообществ в контексте позитивизма, субъективизма, постмодернизма и теории глобализации // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология: 4М). 2001. № 13. С. 27–59.
  15. Кузнецов А. М. Антропология и антропологический поворот современного социального и гуманитарного знания // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2000. Т. 2, № 1. С. 49–67.
  16. Девятко И. Ф. Модели объяснения и логика социологического исследования. М. : РЦГО-TEMPUS/TASIS, 1996. 172 с.
  17. Исупова О. Г. Конверсационный анализ: представление метода // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология: 4М). 2002. № 15. С. 33–52.
Received: 
08.04.2025
Accepted: 
15.05.2025
Available online: 
29.08.2025
Published: 
29.08.2025
Short text (in English):