Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Sociology. Politology

ISSN 1818-9601 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8998 (Online)

Full text PDF(Ru):
Article type: 

Военные науки и наука о войне в понимании российских и австрийских исследователей

Zabuzov O. N., Institute of Socio-Political Research – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISPR FCTAS RAS)

The article is a review of the bilingual collective monograph “Military Sciences versus War Science in Austria and Russia (Militärwissenschaften versus Wissenschaft über Krieg in Österreich und Russland)”. The monograph under review is the result of a Russian-Austrian scientifi c seminar on problems of war and military science. Book consists of two sections. In the fi rst section, the authors of the monograph consider a number of methodological and ideological problems of the war. They give refl ections on the essence of military science, the importance of strategy in the implementation of the military-doctrinal provisions of the state. The conceptual understanding of the strategy is considered. Attention is paid to the essence of the concept of «modern war». Particular emphasis in the monograph is placed on the study of the scientifi c militaryhistorical heritage, the importance of economic, informational, spiritual aspects of the content of modern wars. The trends of «denationalization» of modern wars are shown. The second section of the collective monograph is devoted to applied aspects of modern warfare. In it, the co-authors of the monograph studied the issues of the use of military force in modern society, its use by politics. The problems of the methodology of war are raised, and in particular, the nature of war. Attention is paid to hybridity, consistency, complexity, asymmetry of war. For a better understanding of the essence of war, the concept of “image of war” is introduced into the monograph, characterizing its internal and external manifestations. Considered the idea of developing polemological research in Russia and in the world. Turning to the system of military education in Austria and Germany, the authors postulate the need to preserve the military component in education, which is the basis of the military profession. The publication of such a bilingual joint Russian-Austrian collective monograph should be positively regarded not only from a scientifi c point of view, but also as a factor in establishing scientifi c and business contacts in such diffi cult geopolitical changes in the world.

  1. Белозёров В. К. Дефицит стратегического мышления и императивы его преодоления. Размышления после Венской конференции по стратегии // Власть. 2020. Т. 28, № 1. С. 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31171/ vlast.v28i1.7036
  2. Белозёров В. К. Стратегическая культура в общественно-политическом и научном дискурсе немецкоязычных стран // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Общественные науки. 2022. Вып. 1 (846). С. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.52070/2500-347X_2022_1_846_10
  3. Лапинс В. Стратегическая культура: детерминанты, стандарты действий, модели поведения // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Общественные науки. 2022. Вып. 1 (846). С. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.52070/2500-347X_2022_1_846_29.
Available online: