Подходы к пониманию явления «терроризм» и сравнительный анализ его определения в ключевых юрисдикциях мира
The authors analyze terrorism from the point of view of definitions in the national jurisdictions of the USA, China, EU, and Russia. They also compare approaches to determine key features of this phenomenon in the papers of the most cited researchers of terrorism. National counterterrorism policies are governed by national laws, which depend on the doctrinal basics of the definition of terrorism. The authors use such methods as content analysis and comparative analysis of legislations to identify important aspects of these doctrinal foundations for USA, China, EU, and Russia. They analyze the degree of detail in the interpretation of the concept of “terrorism” in various jurisdictions. The set of national practices and the experience gained in countering terrorism, as well as the specifics of anti-terrorism activities in each of the countries mentioned, leave an imprint on the definition of the phenomenon. The significance of the study lies in the fact that understanding the differences in the definitions of the concept of “terrorism” provides a deeper understanding of approaches to combating terrorist threats.
1 Gibbs J. P. Conceptualization of Terrorism // American Sociological Review. 1989. Vol. 54, № 3. P. 329–340.
2 Evans G., Newnham J. Dictionary of International Relations. L. : Penguin Reference, 1998.
3 Badey T. J. The Role of Religion in International Terrorism // Sociological Focus. 2002. Vol. 35, № 1. P. 81–86.
4 Rogers P. Global Terrorism // Cox M., Stokes D. (eds). US Foreign Policy. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012. P. 335–350.
5 Cronin A. K. Behind the Curve : Globalization and International Terrorism // Mingst K. A., Snyder J. L. Essential Readings in World Politics. N. Y. : W. W. Norton & Company, 2004. P. 367–381.
6 Nau H. R. Perspectives on International Relations : Power, Institutions and Ideas. Washington, DC : CQ Press, 2007.
7 Huntington S. P. The Clash of Civilizations? // Mingst K. A., Snyder J. L. Essential Readings in World Politics. P. 163–169.
8 Comparisons and Implications for Analysis of Strategy // Davis P. K., Larson E. V., Haldeman Z., Oguz M., Rana Ya. Understanding and Infl uencing Public Support for Insurgency and Terrorism. Santa Monica : RAND Corporation, 2012. P. 151–173.
9 Fuller G. E. The Future of Political Islam // Mingst K. A., Snyder J. L. Essential Readings in World Politics. P. 173–180.
10 Willis H. H., Al-Shahery O. National Security Perspectives on Terrorism Risk Insurance in the United States. 6 March 2014. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt6wq804.1 (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
11 United States Code, Title 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, CHAPTER 113B – TERRORISM, Sec. 2331 – Defi nitions. URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2009-title18/html/ USCODE-2009-title18-partI-chap113B-sec2331.htm (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
12 Официальный сайт ФБР США. URL: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism ; URL: http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-3278.html (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
13 Treverton G. F. The Intelligence of Counterterrorism // Jenkins B. M., Godges J. P. The Long Shadow of 9/11 : America’s Response to Terrorism. Santa Monica, СА : RAND Corporation, 2011.
14 全国人大常委会关于加强反恐怖工作有关问题 的决定 (Решение Постоянного комитета Всекитайского собрания народных представителей по вопросу усиления антитеррористической работы (принято на 23-м заседании 11-го Постоянного комитета ВСНП КНР 31 октября 2011 г.). URL: http://www.court.gov.cn/zixunxiangqing-3278.html (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
15 中华人民共和国反恐怖主义法 (2015年12月27日第十 二届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十八次会议日中 华人民共和国主席令第36号公布通过，自2016年1月 1日起施行） (О борьье с терроризмом : закон П.Р.С. (принят на 18-й сессии Постоянного комитета ВСНП КНР 12-го созыва 27.12.2015, обнародован Указом Представителя КНР от 27 декабря 2015 г. № 36, вступил в силу с 1 января 2016 г.). URL: http://www.mps.gov.cn (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
16 DIRECTIVE (EU) 2017/541 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L0541 (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
17 Code des assurances – Article L421-1. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIA RTI000033460248&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006073984 &dateTexte=20181231 (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
18 Deutscher Bundestag. Terrorismus : Defi nitionen, Rechtsgrundlagen und Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung URL: https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/414600/8 8ba85eb1357681569fdea159edc1f3d/WD-3–417-09-pdfdata.pdf (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
19 О противодействии терроризму : федер. закон от 06.032006 № 35-ФЗ // Рос. газ. URL: https://rg.ru/2006/03/10/borba-terrorizm.html (дата обращения: 15.05.2020).
20 Today’s Russia Implications for the United States // Oliker O., Crane K., Schwartz L. H., Yusupov C. Russian Foreign Policy : Sources and Implications. Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corporation, 2009. P. 175–196.
21 O’Brien P. The Muslim Question in Europe : Political Controversies and Public Philosophies. Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 2016.